| « Coopers make barrels | Twist of lime, coke on the side » |
Voting is so bizarre
Had to add this after a conversation with Brodt. From an article on the Condorcet winner. That crazy Arrow and his theorem.
Consider, for example, the following vote count of preferences with three candidates {A,B,C}:
499: A,B,C
498: C,B,A
3: B,C,AIn this case, B is preferred to A by 501 votes to 499, and B is preferred to C by 502 to 498, hence B is preferred to both A and C. So according to the Condorcet criterion, B should win. By contrast, according to the rules of IRV, B is ranked first by the fewest voters and is eliminated, and C wins with the transferred votes from B; in plurality voting A wins with the most first choices.
Any of the candidates could be considered the "winner."
It's even more arous^H^H^H^H^Hexciting because of the correct use of the semicolon.
'Bizarre' contains both 'i' and 'e.' William Shakespeare was never knighted. Too bad.
Trackback address for this post
Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)
8 comments
oh, and maybe i'll have to give it another try with less blunt language.
i think that he can have whatever standards he wants for girls. not liking someone because they're stupid is no more absurd than liking someone because they're pretty, to me.
billy--put it back!
I love you Doug, but I delete poorly worded insults that are not explained, regardless from whom or to whom. Your "less blunt" reply makes much more sense. %)
--Billy
Enjoy Kansas Billy, best of luck to ya. :)
-Keers
hehe,
Denise
Comments are closed for this post.